The PEBC Network
Click to PEBC.org
Click to EdNewsColorado.org
Click to Boettcherteachers.org
Click to Education Research and Practice

Archive for the ‘Teaching and learning’ Category

A concern about Sen. Johnston’s bill

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

I’ve had some informal discussions with some of my teacher colleagues on Senator Mike Johnston’s draft bill titled “Principal and Teacher Effectiveness.” The section that brings up the most concern among teachers has to do with a teacher’s evaluation being based on 50% of their student’s growth over a year. Their concern is captured in an Education Week article “Tying Teacher Evaluation to Student Achievement.”

Factors other than an individual teacher’s efforts affect student performance in any given year. These include the efforts of other teachers involved with a student, the extent of support the student receives outside of school in completing homework and learning the material (tutoring, parental help, and the like), and other family and societal factors that might influence student achievement.

Is it “fair” to judge the effectiveness of a teacher based on factors outside of their control? A specific example is student attendance. If I teach in a class where 30% of the students attend on an irregular basis, should I be evaluated on their growth? How do we take factors beyond a teacher’s control, skipping, for the moment, just what is and is not in a teacher’s control, into consideration if we are to use student performance in teacher evaluations?

I think one of the strengths of the draft is that principals are also evaluated on the growth of students (65%) as well as being evaluated on the quality of teachers in the school building. This allows for whole-school approaches to problems that have been traditionally not addressed or left to individual teachers. By evaluating principals in this manner, I think the concern over what is in the control of a school versus an individual teacher’s control is addressed. But what about those factors outside of a school’s purview?

Popularity: 81% [?]

My son was on her ‘bucket list’

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Mary Pat Holliday

Editor’s note: This article was submitted by Jason Janz, pastor of a church in Five Points and the parent of three Denver Public Schools students. Jason serves on the Cole Arts and Sciences Academy leadership team. His wife Jennifer volunteers in classrooms and works in the children’s ministry at their church.

My wife and I entered Cole Arts and Sciences Academy with little idea of what we were getting ourselves into.

We had just moved to the inner city and were looking for a school for our three school-age boys.  A friend told us to check out Cole — a brand-new school with a new staff and a great leader.  I had no idea of Cole’s troubled history as the only school in Colorado to have been closed down twice.  I had no idea that 96 percent of the kids lived in poverty or that over 90 percent were below grade level in their reading.

No website, school report cards, or records of previous years record could be found.  Cole was a brand new K-8 school.

Just a week before school started, the building appeared to be a disaster.  The school needed significant remodeling work to prepare for the 600 students soon to arrive.  My wife and I ventured through the construction to meet our boy’s prospective teachers and were told we could find the kindergarten teacher in the auditorium.

That’s the first time I met Mary Pat Holliday.  Little did I know I was face-to-face with a woman who would deeply impact our family, just as she had so many DPS parents and students over 30 years.

As she looked up from bending over boxes of books, picking out the textbooks for her new class, she focused on my son.  She made him feel like the most important person in the world.  The smile on Paton’s face made it easier to face the many tests we would encounter in a challenging school.

Born to a coal-miner in Uniontown, Penn., Mary Pat went off to college and upon graduation, helped start a school on Long Island.  After a few years, she wanted a fresh start. So in 1972 she packed her two children in a Volkswagen van and headed for California.  The van decided to break down in Capitol Hill near an apartment complex.

Out of money and needing a place to stay, she swung a deal with the apartment manager.  Mary Pat would babysit the manager’s kids during the day in exchange for using her bath and kitchen.  The family stayed in the van until better accommodations became available.  By this time, Mary Pat was hooked on Denver and would stay here the rest of her life.

Mary Pat embarked on a teaching career and taught generations of young kids not just how to read and write but how to love to learn.  She chose to be an educator in inner-city schools.

Growing up poor, she knew what it felt like to have mentors; people who believed in her and gave her opportunities.

After years teaching in classrooms, she served as program manager for the Gilpin Extended Day Center for 20 years. There, she was able to help enrich an even larger group of children’s lives every day.  Often, she managed as many as 250 children in one day.

After school, she brought in local artists to teach cooking, Spanish, drama, music, art, dance, and many other subjects to enhance the lives of kids.  Mary Pat felt it was vital to give students this experience rather than ending them home to an empty house. With many of the children coming from low-income families, she saw this as a way to foster a sense of possibility for children whose parents had to work.

Her dream was to have a “school that works for people who work.”  The old Gilpin Extended Day program was rated as one of the top ten before-and-after-school programs in the U.S.

Mary Pat spent her last nine years in DPS working with kindergartners – eight at Gilpin and the final year at Cole.  Her indelible impact is evident in the fact that several of her former students have become DPS teachers.

She inspired those around her with her tireless energy, fierce belief and advocacy for children, passion for justice, and commitment to ensuring that every child discovers the joys of learning, expression, and creativity.

Mary Pat possessed an insurmountable grace as she tenaciously approached her work.  Her husband described her as “a nun in hippie clothes.”

Mary Pat was a lifelong learner and seeker.  She regularly gave out tidbits of wisdom she picked up along the way.  Many of them have stayed with me:

  • “Teaching is a lifelong process of learning, not an event…one simply commits to it as a path.”
  • “If you’re not into it, go do something else.  You can’t just hang out.  You have to work.  It’s challenging.  Those are the reasons I loved teaching.”
  • “If I could say one thing to kindergartners, it would be to tell them how smart they are.”
  • “If you don’t make a connection from your heart, they won’t let you teach them.”
  • “The secret to teaching is to see every child as gifted and talented and every kid as having special needs.”

Not long ago, cancer entered Mary Pat’s life.  She described her cancer as a bump in the road, but also a great teacher for her.  It looked like she had beaten cancer until just over a year ago, when tests came back showing that cancer was going to be her companion to the end.

Her doctor encouraged her to form a “bucket list” of meaningful things to do before she passed.  (He was referring to the film starring Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman where two terminally ill men make a list of 20 things they want to do before they die.)

Without skipping a beat, she said, “I am doing something meaningful.  I’m teaching 25 children how to read.  They are my bucket list.”  And she meant it.

As sickness overtook her, Mary Pat labored on.  She lost weight and her clothes would barely hang on her small frame, but she wouldn’t stop.  She would come home from school and fall into bed by 5 p.m. so she could get enough rest to accomplish her task the next day.

My wife and I made brownie runs to her house, as it seemed like that would put an extra bounce in her weary steps.  Paton sat and read to her.  He read his last story to her just a few weeks before she passed away.

I cannot describe how it made me feel knowing that someone was dedicated at great personal cost to seeing my child succeed.  At Mary Pat’s memorial service this past Sunday, my son stood up and read the book she gave him at graduation, “The Very Hungry Caterpillar.”

On the inside cover, was a note, “Yes We Can! Love, Ms. Holliday.”  The book describes the process whereby a caterpillar turns into a butterfly.  It was a fitting metaphor for the impact she had on thousands of Denver children who, when around her, grew into beautiful learners.

A lot of debate about education in our city centers around teacher effectiveness, principal training, types of schools, funding priorities, how to win federal dollars, and the politics of turnarounds.  As a parent, I do not pretend to know the best answer to all these complex issues.

But I do know we would benefit gretly by having as many people as possible with the passion for kids and for learning that Mary Pat Holliday displayed.  She put kids at the top of her bucket list.

Is the education of our children a top priority?  Would it make it to the top of our bucket lists?

A November, 2009 article in the Wall Street Journal reported on a roundtable of CEOs and policy makers who weighed in on the most pressing issues facing our country. The first recommendation said:

“Education is our top national priority—well ahead of health care, climate change and financial regulatory reform—and government and business policies need to reflect that. If we don’t address this, we endanger our children, economy, businesses and national security.”

Sounds like more and more people are seeing what Mary Pat believed her whole life.

Why did I write this article?  First of all, as a parent, I am a fan of teachers.  Having taught a six-week block on a Friday afternoon this year, I gained new respect for urban educators.  But when it comes to who stands in front of my child in the classroom, I have little say.

It can be a helpless feeling at times.  Sometimes, you just have to say what touches your heart in the hope that other teachers will follow this example of greatness.  And it’s not just about my kids.  It’s about the 600-plus kids at Cole.  It’s about all 75,000 students in DPS.

So, from one parent to a district of teachers: Here’s to greatness.  May you pursue your craft with Holliday-like passion.

Second, I would love to see our educational leaders – our superintendent, the staff at 900 Grant St., our school board, our political leaders, our principals, the DCTA leadership, our business leaders, our teachers, our parents, and our community leaders – follow the example of Mary Pat Holliday and make a bucket list today that starts like hers:

1.  See all DPS kids receive an excellent education.

Numbers 2-20 are yours to fill in however you please – Rome, skydiving, the Great Wall, you name it!

And you could thoroughly enjoy it all because you would have helped take care of a top national priority – our children.

Popularity: 98% [?]

This teacher says overhaul tenure

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Let’s talk teacher tenure at the K-12 level. College tenure employs very different requirements—the foremost being the requirement to produce published research. I believe we need to redefine k-12 teacher tenure.

There is good historical evidence to show that teachers needed to be protected from arbitrary employment practices. Female teachers used to be fired from their jobs because they became pregnant. Teacher jobs were used as patronage pawns in urban districts. Do we have labor laws in place now that protect against these practices? If so, what is the purpose of tenure?

Today, based on state law, tenure is awarded after three years of satisfactory teacher performance (performance based on minimal standards). For the most part tenure is awarded based on time. This is like seat-time for students. Students who sit in a seat for a school year are, usually, awarded with graduation to the next grade level. Should students move to the next level of school based on seat time or their academic performance?

Which begs the question: Should teachers be granted tenure based on years of employment or performance?

I’d like to see tenure granted on performance. I’d also like to see tenure move from a permanent designation to one that is assessed every two to three years.

Tenure is a hot topic and educators are looking a revising tenure.  Here’s an article (from a teacher) that proposes changes to tenure.

What do you think? Do we need to redefine tenure? Let’s have an on-line discussion.

Popularity: 39% [?]

What makes a good teacher? A student perspective

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Interesting interview this morning on Colorado Public Radio. The student, Shelby Gonzales-Parker of Justice High School in Denver, is serving on the governor’s Council for Educator Effectiveness. She is also a member of Project VOYCE, a student organizing group that was actively engaged in the community process that informed the state’s Race to the Top application.

Popularity: 23% [?]

Can you teach teaching?

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

In this remarkably insightful article, Doug Lemov seems to think so:

Central to Lemov’s argument is a belief that students can’t learn unless the teacher succeeds in capturing their attention and getting them to follow instructions. Educators refer to this art, sometimes derisively, as “classroom management.” The romantic objection to emphasizing it is that a class too focused on rules and order will only replicate the power structure; a more common view is that classroom management is essential but somewhat boring and certainly less interesting than creating lesson plans. While some education schools offer courses in classroom management, they often address only abstract ideas, like the importance of writing up systems of rules, rather than the rules themselves. Other education schools do not teach the subject at all. Lemov’s view is that getting students to pay attention is not only crucial but also a skill as specialized, intricate and learnable as playing guitar.

I confess I am not a neutral in this debate — Doug is a long-time friend and former teammate, and it was he who first introduced me to the main tenants of education reform almost 15 years ago.  I’ve always considered him one of the most thought-provoking people I know.  We first talked about this subject when Doug stared on his taxonomy years ago.  I think it should be required critical reading for both teachers and parents (although I wish there was a free summary available, you can get a gist through Google Reader).

And the point here is both profound and simple.  While some teachers will recognize a special innate ability in a student, they chose their profession because they believe in their ability to help kids become better learners.  It is a small but critical step to extend this to the other end of the classroom — yes there are some teachers with native skills, but there are ways to help adults become better teachers.

I have seen very few teachers who are not devoted to their profession, and absolutely none that began with less than the best intentions.  I believe strongly that various grinding gears of our public education system prevent teachers from being successful.  I hope this article and the subsequent discussion help even the playing field.  Just as every child deserves a quality education, every teacher deserves the ability — and should embrace the responsibility — to fully develop their craft.

Popularity: 36% [?]

What students need from teachers

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Every now and then I hear a teacher say something or read something a teacher has produced and it sends a chill down my spine. While I was reviewing other schools’ AP recommendation processes (I am our school’s AP Coordinator) I came across some statements on some course descriptions that are truly reflective of teaching stuck in the past.

For an AP English Literature course I read “that it is difficult to earn an ‘A.’” This seemed to be stated as a source of pride. Does this teacher take pride in this “fact?” If so, why are they teaching? Yes, AP courses are difficult, but it is the responsibility of the teacher to get the students to where they need to be. Any expectation less than an “A” for all students is just wrong.

“No late papers, work accepted.” Really? Why? Don’t some students take longer to learn than others? I cannot think of a time in my undergraduate work or my graduate work that a professor denied me more time, unless it was an end of the semester project. Isn’t an AP course supposed to reflect a college level course at the high school level?

Of all the statements I read the following was the most disappointing: “Students take responsibility for learning, but I am always willing to meet with students outside of class for help or to look at drafts ahead of time.” So what is the teacher responsible for? Is the only variable in the classroom the student, not the teacher? Is the only job of the teacher to disseminate information to the student and then let the student know if they got it? I actually heard a teacher say this.

Students do not come to teachers to be sized up and sorted into those who can and those who cannot. They come to teachers to learn.

Popularity: 34% [?]

Andrea Merida articulates her position

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

I don’t agree with Denver school board member Andrea Merida on West Denver Prep. But I’m glad she has articulated her position for the world to see. I hope someone from WDP will respond here to Andrea’s assertions about the school, so that we can have a productive debate.

My question to Andrea: If we see WDP kids move successfully through high school and into college in significant numbers, will you think differently of the school? From what I’ve observed, WDP does not produce test-taking automatons who cannot think critically. It produces confident students, ready for the challenges of rigorous high school programs.

Educating the whole child is great, but if you lack essential skills, shouldn’t those be addressed with urgency?

Popularity: 29% [?]

Seeking differentiation that works

Monday, February 15th, 2010

North High School has 18 percent of its population identified as special education. Another large group is identified as English language learners. Then there are the emergent readers who have managed to make their way into the 10th and 11th grade with 3rd and 4th grade reading abilities. And the final 27 percent of students at North have been identified through CSAP and other measures to be able to read proficiently or even advanced.

All of these students have been placed into the same language arts classes. In the January Collaborative School Committee meeting the principal said that no differentiation was taking place in these classes at North.

If differentiation really can work in this incredibly diverse setting, I seek Ed News readers’ help.

In a previous post on Ed News, folks wrote glowingly about the outcomes of differentiation. I am now on a subcommittee of the North CSC to bring differentiation to these language arts classes next year. I am particularly interested in finding success stories that feature low income, predominantly Hispanic, with English Language Learners and middle income students of all colors, learning together in differentiated classrooms of 35 students with one teacher.

Links to published studies would be greatly appreciated.

As a mom of a kid who has advanced skills in reading and who loves all of the kids described above, I am dedicated to finding these success stories and implementing them in this school.

Popularity: 17% [?]

Texas madrassas

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

As if we don’t have enough to worry about in the world of education…

This article from today’s New York Times Magazine is sobering, if not downright terrifying. The Texas State Board of Education, and its near-majority bloc of hard-core Christian fundamentalists, wants history textbooks rewritten to state that

the United States was founded by devout Christians and according to biblical precepts. This belief provides what they consider not only a theological but also, ultimately, a judicial grounding to their positions on social questions.

What makes this more than just a depressing footnote is the fact that Texas, thanks to its size and statewide curriculum,  wields disproportionate influence over textbook publishers. Apparently the publishers lack the spine to stand up to the looney-tunes stuff coming out of the Texas state board, so kids in Colorado could soon be reading history textbooks promoting this pinched, dangerous and incendiary worldview.

I fail to see how this differs in any substantial way from the Taliban, madrassas and calls for holy war against the infidel. In degree, yes. But it’s still early in the process.

Popularity: 24% [?]

How not to cut teachers

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

My district is facing huge budget cuts for next year. $24 million in cuts to be exact. Since our district is like most, where more than 70% of the budget goes to personnel, we are talking lots of jobs here.

Tough decisions will be made in the next few months. Decisions about which teachers will lose their jobs are based on our Master Agreement. Usually, non-tenured teachers are the first to go. Then, if you have all tenured teachers, you go to a special appendix in the agreement.

Here there are various formulas that you apply to teachers after which you assign points for each tenured teacher; low points=lost job. Points are given for years of service; you receive points for your level of education; and more points are awarded for extra-curricular activities that a teacher may sponsor, like hip-hop club. What would you award points for?

Does it matter? We are going to cut support personnel from the classroom. We will increase class size. Increase the duties that teachers will have to perform as in hall duty and so on. All of this will require the best teachers possible in the classroom. Yet, we won’t make our decisions as to who these teachers are based on their ability to handle the increased work-load. We will use longevity and levels of education to decide which teachers stay.

Perhaps our dire economic and budget situation will force to rethink how we assess teachers.

Popularity: 38% [?]

Daniels fundColorado League of Charter SchoolsColorado Childrens CampaignCollege InvestPitton FoundationsDonnell-Kay Foundation