The PEBC Network
Click to PEBC.org
Click to EdNewsColorado.org
Click to Boettcherteachers.org
Click to Education Research and Practice

Archive for the ‘Parents’ Category

Lemon musical chairs

Monday, February 8th, 2010

In another sign that antiquated and harmful education practices once thought sacrosanct are starting to fall, Denver’s “Dance of the Lemons” — the process by which the teachers no principal will hire are forcibly placed into a classroom somewhere in the public school system — may finally change.

Last year, the Denver Post noted:

Nearly three-quarters of unassigned veteran Denver Public Schools teachers who have not found jobs are forcibly placed into schools with the poorest students… Under union and district rules, these direct placements are made without regard to the desires of the teachers, school principals or parents.

On Friday, DPS superintendent Boasberg announced his intention that the District’s lowest performing schools — almost all with high poverty student demographics — become exempt from receiving any of these teachers.

This is a significant move by DPS, and also long overdue.  Now the music still plays, and lemon dance is not over yet, as under the DCTA contract these teachers will have to be placed somewhere, but the seats are going to be a little harder to find, and far better illuminated.  When higher-performing schools, which generally have a stronger culture and leadership, and more engaged parents, get stuck with lemons, you can bet the chance the system undergoes change increases, because the tolerance for bad teachers will be far lower.  I’ve written about the power of affluent parenting previously — if some of Denver’s best schools suddenly face the forced hiring of several teachers, expect some parents and civic groups to finally take a stand on this deplorable practice.

There is increased agreement that education hiring should be by mutual consent (both the teacher and the principal agree to the hire), an approach that was embraced by the rest of the employed world, oh, just a few decades ago.  Changing the lemon dance to a game of musical chairs is a good first step, but far better would be to turn the music off entirely.

Popularity: 29% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Helicopter down

Monday, May 4th, 2009

The unending desire among well-heeled baby-boomer parents to transform their children into extensions of their own egos has, if anything, intensified in the souls of the succeeding generation. If you doubt this, think about how many young children you know who are scheduled to the hilt. Surely this can’t be good for the kids. So much enrichment must be impoverishing.

In a parallel vein, fighting tooth and nail to get one’s children in the right infant care center so they have a better shot at Harvard is increasingly prevalent. As is pressuring schools to push kids harder, harder, harder — often in the wrong directions. And, naturally, schools have responded to make their customers happy.

That’s why I got such a kick out of this piece in yesterday’s New York Times Magazine.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Out-of-bounds parents at Bromwell

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

A remarkable article about Bromwell Elementary’s problem with out-of-boundary parents:

A school in one of Denver’s ritziest neighborhoods is asking parents to swear under the threat of perjury that they live within the school’s attendance boundaries in an effort to find people who sneak their kids into the school.

When I talk about public education in Denver I usually start with two points: 1) It is far far worse than most people realize (there are virtually no good open-enrollment middle or high schools) and; 2) It is not quite bad enough to mandate real reform, as savvy middle-class parents are able to work the system to get their kids a decent education.

This is a pretty clear indication of #2, although it would seem that the cracks are showing.  Bromwell has enrollment of about 325 students; assuming 1.2 kids per the 30 identified families, we are talking 36 kids, or over 10% of the school, and quite probably more (and I doubt it is limited to Bromwell). This paradox of “really bad – yet not bad enough” creates a stasis that perpetuates a poor system and inhibits reform. If there was ever an advertisement for the need for better choices across the entire district, this is it.

But cutting beneath the basic dialogue of name calling (plenty of that in the article comments), this reveals a complex set of issues.

First, it is that we are talking predominantly about affluent parents — both those who live outside the boundaries and those inside.  The FRL of the school is less then 10%, and I doubt there is a 1:1 correlation (Bromwell’s SAR shows less than 1% black or Latino kids – non-white is limited to Asians).  While middle-class parents are inventive (I’m being polite) to get their kids into a better school, the 67% of DPS families who are poor don’t even have that option – to attend Bromwell, one still has to present a legitimate address, even if it is not yours.

Second, the primary problems in DPS are dropouts, ELL students, and the achievement gap – particularly across middle and high schools.  This issue – affluent parents sneaking their kids into top schools – is not in the calculus (which is partly why the parents are taking it on themselves).  It’s evidence of the pervasiveness of parent unhappiness with local choices.

Third is that there is a sense of entitlement here which – while not an excuse – has the veneer of rationality.  Many of these inventive parents earn a decent living, pay considerable taxes, have chosen to live within city limits, and believe with some justification that the city should provide good choices for public education.  I don’t excuse this, but I understand it (and it is worth noting that the Bromwell district is a peculiar shape, so affluence does not correlate perfectly with school).  The district school closest to Bromwell is Moore Elementary. Bromwell has an overall proficiency rate of 93%.  Moore, with 75% FRL has a proficiency rate of 35%. That’s a pretty big gap. 

Fourth is these are parents fiercely protective of their school and kids.  This is the same school where parents were instrumental in generating a change of school leadership.  On one hand, you have parents falsifying records to attend; on the other hand you have parents trying to govern the school.  Cross either group at your peril.

Parental inventiveness is not limited to Denver.  As Van Schoales points out in an earlier post on local control, some parents may even be headed to jail due to their efforts to find better public education options.

I’ll repeat: Public education in Denver is far far worse than most people realize and it is not quite bad enough to mandate real reform. At the point where the parents who cannot get their kids into good schools are as powerful and pissed as the Bromwell parents trying to keep other kids out, maybe we’ll get some sustained, non-incremental reform strategies.

Lastly, a quick hat-tip to the increasingly-inquisitive Post reporter Jeremy Meyer (also see his blog).  With this story, and his previous one on principal bonuses, Jeremy is shedding some important light on education issues.

Popularity: 5% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Does educational experience earn a demerit?

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Is it now verboten to hire people with an education background to head schools?

Chicago is going to hire the current Chicago Transit Authority head to run Chicago schools.  DPS hired Michael Bennet without educational experience.  Then Bennet annointed someone with no educational experience, Tom Boasberg, to replace him.  I met Boasberg at an “edcuational symposium” at Hill Middle School last week.  He seems a likeable guy who has good numbers sense.

But what about an understanding of curriculum?  What about an understanding of how to change an entrenched culture?  What concerns me the most is that DPS has been without a chief academic officer for months.  Boasberg has his hands full with the budget, especially with DPS’s current pension liabilities.  My concern is that with no one guiding and monitoring curricular issues, the schools will fall into curricular chaos again.

On another topic: the educational symposium turned into a bitch session for West Lowry parents to complain that their students could not attend Lowry Elementary.  Their “local” school is Place K-8 which is also a magnet school for English Language Learners, which the parents found unacceptable.

It was interesting to see the board (the entire board was at this meeting) literally cringe when one of the Lowry parents threatened to send their kids to private schools.  One of the board members remarked that it was important for all of the members to see how decisions made in one member’s district impacted all of the districts.

It caused me to wonder if electing board members based on geographic areas is necessary any more with the advent of choice.  Does a board member stop representing a constituent when they go to a school outside of the boundaries?  Do the board members represent the schools in their boundaries or the families who live there?

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

My big fat school family

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

Our school culture is like a grand eclectic family.

Whether it is the Griswolds, the Bradys or the big fat Greek family that come to mind, the bill fits.

Our immediate families are individual schools that we interestingly enough call our school homes. But the parable of the school family really comes to light when you compare it on a greater scheme.

The extended family in public school districts includes traditional, magnets and charters. We all have our in-laws.

Private schools may be the cousin twice removed that we don’t invite to every get-together, yet keep on the Christmas Card list and high-five at reunions.

Just like any other family we are a mixed bag of nuts. Nobody will admit this about themselves; of course, we each claim to be the only sample of sanity in the group. I say that out of love, but mostly of sincerity.

After years of reliving holiday dinners we have found acceptance, understanding, and mutual admiration.

Conflicts happen in even the most perfect of relationships. Squabbles may take place about our share when the carved carcass of mill and bond funds circle the supper table, or who is better at CSAPs and folding napkins into swans. But we always seem to work it out, and restore that familiar sense of community and camaraderie.

Who am I in this school family? I am a parent-a charter school parent. In an assortment of nuts I am a peanut. I hope my mere presence won’t cause your face to swell up like a gourd, or a tightening of the airways. Most of the school family views us zany charter moms as friendly contributors rather than an immediate rush for an EpiPen.

My blogs are from the skewed view of the charter school experience.  It’s the perspective of a peanut, which is not really a nut-it’s a legume.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Daniels fundColorado League of Charter SchoolsColorado Childrens CampaignCollege InvestPitton FoundationsDonnell-Kay Foundation