The PEBC Network
Click to PEBC.org
Click to EdNewsColorado.org
Click to Boettcherteachers.org
Click to Education Research and Practice

Archive for the ‘Legislative/political follies’ Category

Colorado races sideways

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

“Today’s message is that process trumps substance.”

That was the glum assessment of a long-time Denver education reformer yesterday as we walked together out of the love-fest that was the state’s Race to the Top application submission press conference. And indeed, that seems to be the growing consensus among at least a narrow swath of wonks and analysts, both local and national. See Nancy Mitchell’s story and today’s Denver Post editorial for a taste of the analysis.

Gov. Bill Ritter and Lt. Gov. Barbara O’Brien focused their remarks yesterday on the importance of having “key stakeholders” (let’s drive a stake through the heart of the term stakeholders, shall we?) reach agreement on provisions of the R2T application. The practical impact was a lengthy delay in producing a new system for evaluating teachers; a system that would, presumably, use student growth data to help assess which teachers were serving kids well.

Ritter and O’Brien said they didn’t want Colorado to be like those mean states that called special legislative sessions to ram through new laws dealing with evaluation over the objections of teachers’ associations and other interest groups. It’s a calculated risk that the U.S. Department of Education and the R2T judges will value kumbaya over kick-some-butt. Even Ritter and O’Brien seemed more than willing to acknowledge that Colorado might not finish in the money in R2T’s first round.

“The interests of adults won out over the interests of kids,” someone else complained yesterday. Actually, that’s a tired canard used whenever your side doesn’t emerge on top. Still, despite yesterday’s self-congratulation event, the mood in Colorado education circles isn’t exactly upbeat right now.

Popularity: 18% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

The final sprint

Friday, January 15th, 2010

It appears there are about 10-15 states rounding the last lap in the Race to the Top marathon. It’s going to be a nail-biter. Louisiana and Florida seem to be in the lead. Delaware, Rhode Island, Tennessee and D.C. are sprinting to the wire. Texas, being Texas, and its Republican governor, have given the finger to the Dems in D.C. and decided to bail out.

I’m still guessing that Colorado has roughly a 50% chance of nailing a grant, but everything depends on the final sprint. I and most of the other wonks I talk to think it’s going to come down to which states are serious about teacher quality. New York, apparently realizing that Arne Duncan is not backing down, is now trying to make legislative changes before 4:30 p.m. EST, January 19 — the application deadline.

I’m still cheering for the Centennial State, but I do worry about our chances unless we address teacher tenure, evaluation and dismissal. It’s up to State Sen. Mike Johnston and our legislature to make the final push.

Popularity: 16% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Sunlight and election questions

Monday, September 21st, 2009

The plight of newspapers is well known; how information about important topics like school board races is disseminated and reviewed by voters is both incredibly important and in real flux. How does the public – especially a younger demographic less likely to read newspapers — get in-depth information from candidates, especially on tough questions?

EdNews — with a staff whose news credentials are outstanding — sent all candidates for the Denver school board elections a questionnaire with some very pointed questions. How different candidates responded to this opportunity to reflect, consider, and publicly share their unedited views is a pretty good filter to judge how they might approach the office.

So, full story link and a quick summary follows – I encourage everyone to read the specific replies:

At-Large Seat: Candidates Christopher Scott and Mary Seawell both responded to the questionnaire.  There are some sharp and important differences here in both substance and approach, and both are worth reading: (see: Scott response, and Seawell response). Candidate Fard did not respond.

District 2: Candidate Ismael Garcia responded by answering the questions (Garcia response). Candidate Andrea Merida replied with a canned statement of little relevance to the questions (Merida’s statement). (more…)

Popularity: 4% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

D.C. Defaults

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Somewhat ironically, after my post yesterday about the academic success in the DC school system, it seems that their financials are a particular mess.

The District missed a $103 million payment due to its 60 charter schools this morning, triggering serious cash flow problems for many of the publicly funded, independently operated schools and raising new questions about D.C. government’s ability to meet its commitments as revenue declines. The delay means that some schools will not be able to meet their payroll.

The sheer irresponsibility and irony of a district, unable to manage own its finances, that in turn stiffs the very organizations to whom it has granted financial autonomy is breathtaking.  That these same charters, who have managed their financial autonomy well enough to remain solvent, will now be unable to pay their teachers — while teachers within the dysfunctional district system are unaffected seems particularly delicious.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Pension drama, Act I

Friday, June 5th, 2009

I wrote a few weeks ago about the coming municipal (and other) pension morass, which some of Colorado’s elected officials seem intent on denying.  My point was simple: in coming years benefits are going to be reduced, and/or contributions raised.

Turns out we did not have to wait years, just weeks.  I think we can fairly say the following will be just the first act, but we’ll have to wait to see if it is tragedy or comedy.

Teachers and other public employees, and PERA, take note:

ALBANY — Gov. David A. Paterson and the state’s public employee unions announced on Friday that they had agreed to a deal to limit pension benefits for future public employees in an attempt to control the state’s ballooning costs for retirees. [...]

For future employees, the retirement age will rise to 62 from 55, and they will have to contribute 3 percent of their own salaries to their pensions for their entire careers, instead of the current requirement that they contribute for their first decade of service.

New workers will not vest in the pension plan until they reach 10 years of service, instead of the current five. The deal will also limit the amount of overtime that employees can use in their last years of work to increase their pension benefits.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

The perils of over-legislating

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Much has been made of the strange case of Marie Morrow, who has been suspended and faces expulsion from Cherry Creek shools for having some mock rifles in her car. The usual suspects are beating up on the usual suspects. The school district is being pilloried for overreacting to an honest mistake by a good kid.

But think about if or a moment. The legislature put a “zero-tolerance” law on the books post-Columbine that arguably gives school districts little or no discretion in such circumstances. So perhaps the problem lies with the legislature, not the district. I often think about the passage in Jerry Wartgow’s book where eager legislators come to him, as DPS superintendent, and ask him what bills they might carry for him. His response: the best thing you can do for DPS is pass no new education legislation this session.

In the current reality, such a common-sense suggestion is unthinkable. Legislators have to run for reelection every two or four years. To make a case to the electorate, they need to show that they have sponsored or carried legislation. Education is a popular target for both the left and right.

And so, my friends, we end up with a lot of foolishness, some of it driven by political ambition, regardless of whether it moves education in the right direction.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

An alternative to Rhee’s head-banging style?

Friday, January 9th, 2009

There is a piece published in yesterday’s Washington Post that suggests criticisms of Michelle Rhee’s approach to reform.  It’s an interesting article that deserves attention, even though I think it’s a too-facile way to critique Rhee.  What it does do for me is raise some questions, which I offer at the end of this post.

Very briefly (because you really should read the piece itself) the reporter describes a high-minority, high-poverty school in nearby Silver Spring, Maryland (Montgomery County School District):  “At Broad Acres eight years ago, test scores were so low that the state threatened to take the place over. [The Superintendent and Principal] decided to remake the school. They negotiated with the teachers union to add extra hours to the workweek for extra pay. …  Rhee’s faceoff with the Washington Teachers’ Union creates a dynamic different from the cooperation” in Montgomery County.

The article also describes the way that the school district demands high expectations but does so in a way that is caring and responsive to the needs of teachers and students.

The reporter promises a follow-up article on Sunday, based on visits to a DC district school.

I know Superintendent Rhee has a lot of friends who blog here, and I expect that they will read this article and think, “But DC was (and is) much more dysfunctional that Montgomery County ever was.”  That is, I think, true.  If Rhee eases off on the heavy-handed stuff, she will undoubtedly lose something.

But is the Washington Teachers’ Union that much different than the one in Montgomery?  Are the students and teachers that much different than at Broad Acres?  And, most importantly, isn’t there an obvious limit to how much can be accomplished in DC by banging heads?  Can a school like Broad Acres be created and sustained in an environment marked by distrust?

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

State succumbs to soda silliness

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

Earlier this week came the anticipated release of the School Accountability Reports, and we learned:

The annual December ratings, officially known as the School Accountability Reports, or SARs, are based on the already released results of state exams given the previous spring – and they’ve been flat for years.

That’s funny. You might think the problems of lagging student performance and the achievement gap had been solved. At least if you read the headline story that came out of yesterday’s State Board meeting:

After a hearing and discussion lasting more than an hour, the State Board of Education Wednesday approved regulations that set nutritional standards for beverages sold and distributed in Colorado’s schools.

Members voted 7-0 to expand the proposed regulations and ban sale of diet soda in high schools. The original language proposed by Department of Education staff included only sugared sodas in the ban.

The new rules set different beverage restrictions and portion sizes for elementary, middle and high schools. Sports drinks and non-sugared teas will be allowed in high schools.

The board had little room for maneuver, given that Senate Bill 08-129, passed by the 2008 legislature, set fairly detailed standards for what the board regulations should say. The regulations proposed by staff were the minimum required by the law.

The juxtaposition of these two stories in the same week made me chuckle. Some believe the great need for public education is to be the nutrition nanny. Others of us think public education should be focused more on serving the needs of the public (students, families, businesses, and other taxpaying citizens) to help produce a more educated populace. What does a state ban on Johnny and Suzie’s ability to buy a Pepsi at school teach them about personal responsibility, for example?

It isn’t the State Board’s fault. As Todd Engdahl’s story indicates, the Republican majority would not have passed it if they had their druthers. They just had to implement rules for the bill passed on the other side of Colfax.

At least some Board members had fun with it. It was an odd tag-team performance by vice chair Bob Schaffer and Democrat Evie Hudak (in her swansong meeting) that added diet sodas to the ban. While Hudak appeared to be a true believer in the idea, this observer was left to wonder if Schaffer wasn’t angling to impose the full burden of the Democrats’ ban on those complicit with the action. Who knows?

The unanimously-approved amendment, “To the greatest extent possible beverage products will be Colorado-produced products,” demonstrated how little seriousness the issue was given, and how little it deserved.

So can we get back to our regularly scheduled school reform broadcasting? No one likes their soda flat, but we should be even less satisfied when student achievement is flat.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

New, old faces on ed committees

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

Although legislative leaders haven’t formally announced committee lineups for the 2009 session, some names are coming out.

Word is the Senate Education Committee  will include Democrats Bob Bacon of Fort Collins (a returnee, likely the chair), Chris Romer of Denver (vice chair), Evie Hudak of Arvada, Rollie Heath of Boulder and Peter Groff of Denver.

Hudak, now a State Board of Education member, and Heath, an unsuccessful Democratic candidate for governor years ago, are newbies. Groff, of course, is Senate president and a leading advocate of education reform, including his Innovation Schools Act of 2008.

Republicans being mentioned are Nancy Spence of Centennial, a member the last two years with a high interest in education issues, and incoming Sen. Keith King of Colorado Springs, a former state rep, CCHE member, school board member and charter school president. It’s uncertain whether Josh Penry of Fruita, recently chosen as minority leader, or Mike Kopp of Littleton, new GOP caucus chair, will return to the panel.

The lineup’s a little less clear for House Ed, but one observer expects “most of the same Democrats” to return. The lineup last year was Mike Merrifield of Manitou Springs (chair), Debbie Benefield of Arvada, Nancy Todd of Aurora, Andy Kerr of Lakewood, Cherylin Peniston of Westminster, Judy Solano of Brighton (vice chair), Karen Middleton of Aurora and Christine Scanlan of Dillon.

Republican Reps. Cory Gardner of Yuma, Ken Summers of Lakewood and Tom Massey of Poncha Springs may make returns.

Because of the overall partisan shifts in the two Houses, Republicans apparently will lose one seat on Senate Ed but gain one on House Ed.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

CCI stays open: a travesty of a mockery of a sham

Friday, June 27th, 2008

I haven’t carefully studied the strange case of Challenges, Choices and Images charter school. But then again, the facts seems so stark that I’m not sure I need to. In voting 7-0 to keep open a school that is by all measures failing, the Denver school board would seem to be doing the equivalent of keeping a ripening corpse on life support to make the family feel better.

Will Denver never close a charter school, no matter how hideous its performance? It is beginning to seem that way. The board’s reluctance to pull the trigger actually tarnishes even the city’s stellar charters. Unlike the Life Skills charter, which the district had valid reasons to spare, CCI students would have other options, which couldn’t possibly be worse. (Could they?)

Never mind that the school will have a new leader,  governing board, chalk, fresh paint on the walls, fresh-cut flowers in every classroom, whatever. The fact that this school will remain open is, to quote Woody Allen (that well-known school reformer), a travesty of a mockery of a sham.  

The impressive new DPS School Performance Framework ranks CCI as one of the four worst elementary schools in the city, the second-worst middle school, and the single worst high school See the data here ).  CCI is not a new school: its CSAP results have been in sharp decline since 2005, and were not particularly good back then.

In 2007, not a single student was proficient in 8th grade math or writing, and just 8% were proficient in reading; in 10th grade again zero in math, 3% in writing and 21% in reading.  I can hardly wait to see the 2007-08 numbers.  On CCI’s School Accountability Report the school ranked low in every category, and was in decline in both elementary and middle, with a significant decline in high school.   

And did you notice that I haven’t even mentioned the juicy stuff yet? The "mixing public and private dollars, hiring convicted felons and bouncing paychecks to its teachers,"  to quote the dailies?

The stringent corrective actions the board is now forcing upon the school are probably a couple of years too late. I guess it took a full-blown crisis, like having the assistant principal arrested for buying crack (not his first arrest by a long shot) to force some action.

I hope CCI becomes the next Denver School of Science and Technology. But I’m no David Blaine: I’m not holding my breath.

 

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Daniels fundColorado League of Charter SchoolsColorado Childrens CampaignCollege InvestPitton FoundationsDonnell-Kay Foundation