The PEBC Network
Click to PEBC.org
Click to EdNewsColorado.org
Click to Boettcherteachers.org
Click to Education Research and Practice

Author Archive

Clogged pipes

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Alan Gottlieb and Nancy Mitchell did a great job highlighting one of the most important indicators of a public education pipeline and high school.

Are Colorado urban high schools and their school districts preparing kids to enter college without needing remediation?

Unfortunately in many cases, the answer is a resounding NO.  I do wonder whether any district or schools can make progress given high school structures, history and culture.    We’ve got 30 years of failed attempts to transform existing urban high schools; here’s hoping there’s more thoughtful reflection on these failures so new schools can be made to work for most kids.

This remediation data raises a number of very important questions that few policy makers or educators seem to be taking seriously these days in spite of all kinds of mostly good new reforms.

This remediation data is probably one of if not the most important measure of quality when thinking about the future of our democracy, communities and economy.

  1. What does this say about the 20th century high school design/practices for low-income students?
  2. Why is this remediation data not provided to kids and families when entering these schools?
  3. Why doesn’t Colorado connect our student level data to the National Student Clearing House data so that we can accurately track how every Colorado high school graduate does when entering higher education throughout the US?
  4. How should remediation data be included in a new 2.0 version of a Colorado Report Card for High Schools (you’d think more policy makers would be calling for one using all the various data sources including the growth measures)?
  5. What’s the “return on investment” on preparing college ready students?   My estimates are that Denver’s West High school’s “return on investment” for college ready graduates is about $3,000,000 per college ready graduate compared to Denver School of Science and Technology at about $70,000 per student (blog post to follow) .

Popularity: 20% [?]

Right, left and wrong

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

The “left” has it right about TABOR but gets it wrong about funding the status quo while the “right” has it right about teachers but also gets it wrong about progress on education reform.

If only we could cut through the tired political frames and get to what works or at least has a chance at working for kids.

Popularity: 10% [?]

Waiting for action

Monday, February 1st, 2010

The education reform community finally has an award winning documentary with a powerful message.  “Waiting for Superman” won the Audience Choice Award last week at the Sundance Film Festival.  It will be fascinating to see how it plays with the same audience that loved Davis Guggenheim’s last doc, “An Inconvenient Truth.”

I wonder if liberals will heap praise for it given the content and whether conservatives will embrace it given its bona fide liberal director.

I can’t wait to see it.

Popularity: 16% [?]

Who will get hit the hardest?

Monday, January 25th, 2010

I wonder what Great Education Colorado and others who advocate  for more money for education (with little discussion of reform) are suggesting now that districts are going to have to slash anywhere from 5-10% of their budgets.  For the record, I believe Colorado needs some major reforms AND more funding for Pre-K to 20.

I’m somewhat surprised that there has been little discussion of the implications of a 5-7% budget cut on class sizes.   My rough calculation is that these cuts may have a 10-15% impact on class size depending on how districts and the unions manage the cuts.

The current seniority tenure system that forces most districts to operate under the mechanism of last hired, first fired will likely have a disproportionately large impact on the youngest teachers (and ultimately classrooms).   In a layoff situation, it may be easier to get rid of probationary teachers but it will result in a greater number of layoffs than a 5-7% budget cut might portend.

Districts like Boulder, Englewood, Cherry Creek and Littleton with more experienced teacher pools will be the hardest hit in this situation.  To top things off, most of these cuts are likely to done without any reference to teacher effectiveness.

By the way, it’s great to see the Harrison district leaping ahead of most other districts with new systems and a culture linking teaching to impact.  It will be interesting to see how Superintendent Mike Miles and his team manage these cuts.

For those wanting more background on some of these issues, check out Marguerite Roza’s policy brief from last year on the national implications of the recession.

Popularity: 32% [?]

The final sprint

Friday, January 15th, 2010

It appears there are about 10-15 states rounding the last lap in the Race to the Top marathon. It’s going to be a nail-biter. Louisiana and Florida seem to be in the lead. Delaware, Rhode Island, Tennessee and D.C. are sprinting to the wire. Texas, being Texas, and its Republican governor, have given the finger to the Dems in D.C. and decided to bail out.

I’m still guessing that Colorado has roughly a 50% chance of nailing a grant, but everything depends on the final sprint. I and most of the other wonks I talk to think it’s going to come down to which states are serious about teacher quality. New York, apparently realizing that Arne Duncan is not backing down, is now trying to make legislative changes before 4:30 p.m. EST, January 19 — the application deadline.

I’m still cheering for the Centennial State, but I do worry about our chances unless we address teacher tenure, evaluation and dismissal. It’s up to State Sen. Mike Johnston and our legislature to make the final push.

Popularity: 16% [?]

2009′s 13 education movers and shakers

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

As the new year dawns, I thought it would be proper to praise Colorado education leaders who made a significant difference in 2009.

These have been banner years in Colorado, with so many working so tirelessly on Colorado education reform.   We’ve seen incredible developments on the education front, with new schools like Denver School of Science and Technology getting ALL of their students prepared and going to college while we’ve had dramatic policy change with the Innovative Schools Act and implementation of the new growth model.

Given all of the great work in Colorado, it was challenging to come up with a top 13 list (I like odd numbers).   I have chosen people that have done great work in 2009; work that will likely have a lasting impact on Colorado public education for years to come.   Please note that the education leaders praised here are not presented in any particular order of importance.

1. John Barry, Superintendent of Aurora, for making radical system change and quickly demonstrating that it is possible to turn around an urban school system.

2. Amy Slothower, Executive Director, Get Smart Schools, for creating a new high quality selective MBA principal training degree program and providing invaluable support for number of new high quality schools on the front range.

3. Frank Roti, Principal of DPS’ Beach Court elementary for demonstrating that neighborhood district-managed schools can support nearly all of their students to reach proficiency.

4. Zach McComsy, Founding Head of School, Atlas Prep Charter in Colorado Springs, for demonstrating that it is possible to replicate a high performing charter school through hard work and thoughtful planning.

5. Barbara O’Brien, Colorado’s lt. governor, for racing ahead of all other 50 states and taking the lead on developing a roadmap to improved public education through Colorado’s Race to the Top proposal.

6. Tom Boasberg, superintendent of DPS for taking on the leadership of Denver’s schools and going deeper and faster on systemic reform than any other Denver superintendent.

7. Federico Pena, Chairman of the Board, A + Denver for leading a relatively new non-profit to both support Denver’s reforms and push DPS to go even bolder on changes for Denver’s most needy kids.

8. Cathy Lund, Program Officer from the Walton Family Foundation for providing significant funding and other support to Denver Public Schools and others that goes way beyond the traditional Walton charter school support.  Walton has stepped up to seed the substantive real system change that involves support for Denver Public Schools and development of new high performing charter schools.

9. Chris Gibbons, Executive Director of West Denver Prep, for leading and replicating high performing middle schools while helping lead a movement for proving high quality middle school education West Denver and the state.

10. Nancy Mitchell, reporter, EdNews Colorado for breaking critical education news with thoughtful objective analysis while keeping us all honest.

11. Ben Jackson, teacher at DPS’ Bruce Randolph showing that you can help lead a teacher professionalization movement through Denver Teachers for Change while being a great classroom teacher and an active member of the union.

12. Moira Cullen, lobbyist for Capstone Group representing MOP, CO Succeeds, TFA and head of Colorado Democrats for Education Reform, for leading the charge  in the capitol on a variety of important policy changes from school accountability, school autonomy and teacher quality and making it possible for Democrats to embrace education reform as the 21st century civil rights struggle.

13. Dwight Jones, Colorado Commissioner of Education, for demonstrating that CO commissioners can make a difference on achievement through support on improving districts and schools while implementing great new tools like the Colorado Growth model.

It has been a great year for Colorado education reform, I had another 20-30 people who were contenders for the list but I had to make some hard choices.   Let’s hope the contenders list grows to several hundred next year when we begin to implement our bold system changing Race to the Top proposal!

Popularity: 52% [?]

Speaking of censorship…

Friday, December 4th, 2009

It appears an EdNews reader or readers tried to shut down the website this week. The attack occurred minutes after Alan Gottlieb sent out his weekly newsletter, and hit different servers in different places that host the site and its blog.

While it will be interesting to know whether there is a criminal investigation, or if the attack can be traced to someone, it is depressing that some reader of EdNews is so upset that they would violate EdNews’ first amendment’s rights and shut it down.

Ironically, though not surprising the cyber attack was similar to the ones recently launched from North Korean computers, the wonderful land of free press, democracy and open public discussion. 

It’s a great reminder to renew my expired ACLU membership.

Popularity: 13% [?]

The disturbing rise of “advocacy tanks”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

So what’s the difference between advocacy and research?  It seems to get fuzzier these days as the stakes in the reform debate gets ever more heated with increasing data access and less money.   There’s a scary trend developing where all interests in the various debates which include teacher unions, business leaders and foundations are using so called “think tanks” to further their particular agendas.

The latest and possibly scariest local entry is Kevin Welner’s Education and the Public Interest Center (EPIC) which appears to be a group of education professors funded by teacher unions and others to support advocacy briefs that claim charters, vouchers, student choice, student-based budgeting, on-line schools and standards don’t work.

EPIC looks like an advocacy think tank designed to try to shoot down anything that challenges the current way of doing public education other than adding more money to the system.  By the way I think we do need more money, I just wouldn’t continue to spend it in the same way we do now.

EPIC’s latest advocacy brief is the recently deceased Gerald Bracey’s last report.  I have to admit that I did sometimes enjoy reading Bracey’s pointed attacks on education reformers. I will miss him. But his last “report” takes the cake.

Bracey has the audacity to argue that high-quality schools will not do much to eliminate the achievement gap between whites and minorities.  He even suggests that we can’t define what high quality might mean.  He actually states that “politicians and educators ignore the evidence and continue to march under the misbegotten banner that “all children can learn.”

He sounds like a liberal version of Charles Murray’s pseudoscientific and arguably racist theories in “The Bell Curve.”  Poor kids are dumb and there’s nothing to be done about it in the classroom.  Murray says it’s their genes and Bracy claims it’s their environment.  In the end they both come to the same conclusion about the power of schools.

Having said all of this, I welcome the arguments and discussion from Welner, Berliner or Bracey, I just wish they were more honest about their non-objective advocacy and stop hiding behind their PhD’s and University affiliations.

Most of the statements in these briefs would never pass muster with the National Research Council or any other serious research body’s standards.  EPIC is mostly advocacy with some light policy research thrown in much like the American Enterprise Institute, the Independence Institute and countless other “advocacy tanks.”

Popularity: 41% [?]

Got chocolate?

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

I just saw this AP article on the front of Education Week and thought for a moment I was reading the Onion.

Apparently the same folks that gave us the “Got Milk” ad campaign will launch a new million dollar effort called “Raise Your Hand for Chocolate Milk” with a full page ad in USA Today.  The argument goes that chocolate helps kids choose milk over the other forms of sugar water served in many schools.

Who says it will hard to get kids to eat healthy?  Why stop with milk?  I say we should serve chocolate broccoli and peas…anyone remember chocolate cigarettes?  And while we are at it maybe we should have schools “go green” by selling Coca-Cola products so that we might have a cleaner world.

Interestingly, the Colorado dairy folks were one of the main sponsors of the Legacy Foundation’s lunch last week celebrating schools and districts that are focused on children’s health.

Popularity: 6% [?]

Reality check?

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

It looks like Colorado will have to step it up if we are going to win any Race to the Top funds. The latest national report  from the country’s largest business lobby in combination with a leading right and center left think tanks puts Colorado in the middle on education innovation.

And guess where we got some of the lowest marks?

Post-secondary pipeline, data and removing ineffective teachers… It would appear that we are going to have to make some bold policy changes in the first month of this legislative session if we expect to win the race.

It was strange to see Colorado get an “A” for finance. God help the states that got an “F.”

Popularity: 6% [?]

Daniels fundColorado League of Charter SchoolsColorado Childrens CampaignCollege InvestPitton FoundationsDonnell-Kay Foundation