You are viewing the EdNews Blog archives.
These archives contain blog posts from before June 7, 2011
Click here to view the new Voices section of EdNews

Author Archive

Douglas County choice: ‘Something like paradise’

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

Karin Piper is an author, speaker and education advocate

“Something of a public school paradise.” That is how the Los Angeles Times recently described the Douglas County School District (DCSD). So what merits this title of academic bliss?

Well, Douglas County is largely a suburban community between Denver and Colorado Springs and what research-type folks like to call largely homogeneous. Douglas County schools have roughly 60,000 children enrolled, the dropout rate is merely 1.3 percent, 89.1 percent of its students graduate and just  10.9 percent of the enrolled students receive free and reduced lunch.

The Douglas County Scholarship Program will make private schools a possibility for more families who seek it.

Each year 15,000 Douglas County parents and community members contribute more than a half a million hours of volunteer service, and recent survey results show a satisfaction rating of more than 90 percent.

Perhaps it is this active and engaged role in our kids’ schools that also has created a highly informed parent community. Parents start “shopping” for schools very early, sometimes as part of a planned pregnancy. After all, schools aren’t just schools to involved parents; schools are selected based on fit for both student and family philosophy.

As a cultural result, this public Garden of Edu-n has a thriving flora of quality schooling options. There are online schools, charters, magnets, and naturally the traditional neighborhood schools. If you are wondering what makes each of these schools unique and attractive to the astute school shopping families, keep a keen eye on the Douglas County website www.dcsdk12.org. Over the next few weeks, Douglas County is going to reveal an online presence that will knock choosy parents’ socks off.

Just as in any other district in the United States, Dougco families can also opt to send their children to private schools. Or can they?

You see, many families in areas like Douglas County do have the option of private education, because they can afford it. To others, this is not a financial possibility. Remember 10.9 percent of Douglas County’s students receive a free or reduced lunch. Many other families fall somewhere in between. There are plenty of families in Douglas County who do not qualify for financial aid for private schools, but cannot afford adding tuition costs to their budget.

This would make non-public academic options for some, well, the forbidden fruit.

It also raises the question about kids whom the current schools could not serve well. Even in an overall high-performing district, being everything to everyone is still impossible. What about the 1.3 percent that dropped out? Or the 10.1 percent that did not graduate? These statistics do not represent numbers, but real children with beating pulses, names and futures. Could an additional type of education provider have made a difference? How will we know without actually offering it?

That’s what the elected Douglas County Board of Education would like to do.

In response to public demand for choice, and based on task force recommendations, the board voted in December to accept a proposal to make non-public education available to public school families through exercising local control. Parents, the board had said, should be given the power to choose where their kids go to school and should have as many options as possible. The program would allow parents to spend a portion of their children’s per pupil revenue toward tuition costs at a participating private school.

Since then the DCSD staff has been working hard on creating a program which is viable within this space and current laws. That is both an arduous and sizable task.

There is pressure on staff and education leaders from all sides. Some are hopeful for a design that has so little accountability that it is unlikely to be created under current laws. Others won’t like it even if it was dipped in chocolate. And it sort of is.

In a perfect scholarship world per-pupil revenue ought to follow the student all the way. In the current Dougco scholarship program only 75 percent would follow the child. The remaining 25 percent would stay in the district to pay for overhead costs and a “contingency fund,” to alleviate any financial burden if “too many students from one public school would leave.” How many kids are we really talking here? The 2011-12 pilot program is suggested to permit up to 500 kids to sample this new concept. To clarify, that is 500 children in a district of 60,000, or less than 1 percent. According to the district financial staff, the pilot program at capacity would net the school district $400,000.

Personally I am a supporter of this program, but not due to possible revenue gains or political reasons. As a matter of fact, if you thought I was a political zealot you may just as well put away your label-gun now. I can guarantee that you have me all wrong, regardless of which brand you had in mind.

No, I am just a mom and my motives are very simple: The Douglas County Scholarship Program will make private schools a possibility for more families who seek it.

Is it perfection? Nope. Until all children truly have equal access to a free education regardless of schooling type, it won’t be. But take it from someone who gets giddy over a coupon for free coffee or 10 cents off my gap, a $4,000 discount will make a significant difference for many, many families. And hopefully this creative approach to bridging public and private education will invite investors with the purpose of providing additional support for the neediest families.

Are private schools better than Douglas County public schools? That depends on whom you ask. I can sit here and regurgitate data all day long, but in the end who gets to decide if one is better serving a child or not? The parent.

Until the day that we have found the magic bullet of education, even the best schools—regardless of type–will continue to see drop-out rates, lack-of graduation, or dissatisfaction for one reason or another. Better from an educrat’s standpoint isn’t always better in the eyes of a parent.

Why should this be done in a high performing district? Why not? Wouldn’t we want districts that already do well for the majority of kids to try innovative ideas and lead? It would be great if this program had already been introduced by districts where needy children are stuck in failing schools. But haven’t we waited long enough for those leaders to take action? Certainly another district being first out of the gate won’t stop those districts for developing such programs too, if it so behooves them.

Do public education dollars belong to the district or the student? We can argue this until pigs fly, so here is the argument from me, the parent. To be brief: It is called per pupil revenue. That implies the education dollar belongs to the pupil, in translation, the child. The child definitely belongs to the parent. Not your neighbors. Not the neighbor’s grandpa. And in most cases, our kids are not wards of the state. Therefore, the parent decides where the student goes to school and the funds come along.

Will the scholarship program cause DCSD to lose families to private schools? They already do.

Would parents take their kids out of DCSD neighborhood schools because the cost went down? I find that doubtful. Remember that Dougco parents are savvy shoppers and know what they want. If they are happy with their children’s school, as 90 percent said they are, then they are going nowhere.

What would make parents enthusiastic about staying in their current schools? I am so glad you (hypothetically) asked! The Douglas County School Choice Plan is packed with exciting programs. The scholarship program is only a fraction of it. Again, I strongly encourage you to visit Douglas County’s website and often over the next few weeks. You don’t want to miss Education Paradise 2.0.

Popularity: 32% [?]

Advice to charterless states: Just do it.

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

What do Alabama, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia have in common?

They are 10 states in the U.S. that do not have acharter school law.

For awhile, during this past legislative session it looked like Maine was about to change this fact about their state, but it did not happen. Yet.

Watching the process can be maddening, especially for families who are desperately seeking alternatives in education, but may not be able to afford private schools.

As we heard in Maine this summer, the drawbacks to not having charter schools (more…)

Popularity: 2% [?]

Charter mom’s view of DOE briefing

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

The US Department of Education held a media briefing this afternoon in an effort to deliver answers on reform.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan discussed how the quality of states’ public charter schools will support the ability to compete for grants from the “Race to the Top” fund, the $4.35 billion program in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act designed to help states make substantial gains in student achievement.

As a parent, it isn’t every day I get to listen directly to media briefings by the Education Department. Since this one had to do with charter schools, it was even closer to my heart.

This is a recap of the event with the narration of a charter school parent.

Duncan began by saying that states must be open to charter schools, because (more…)

Popularity: 2% [?]

An enterprising student gets punished

Friday, April 24th, 2009

Remember what it was like to be a kid?

Oh, how we wanted to grow up. We’d daydream of becoming our adult professional selves and role-play such fantasies. In some cases we’d even get the props, like the cool doctor’s kit with the plastic tetanus shot, or the astronaut costume which was out of this world.

So if you are a child with aspirations of becoming a teacher, what tools of the trade would you need for playing school? Well, there are students (check), number two pencils (check), and…ah yes!–The ever so important secret state standards tests.

Well, that seemed easy enough for a crafty Pennsylvania fifth grader to solve.

This future edu-guru simply got online and ordered some.

It didn’t really become a problem until a package of shrink-wrapped tests landed in someone’s inbox at the Hempfield Area School District. The district officials were scratching their heads wondering why they suddenly received more tests than ordered and started looking into things.

The lad had thoroughly provided his home address and contact information on the order he had faxed to the test making publisher–Data Recognition Corp., of Maple Grove, Minn. His reported motives were not to cheat on the exam, but to practice his future profession.

“We take security breaches very seriously,” department spokeswoman Leah Harris said.

So do the boy’s parents who are not thrilled about the matter.

The Associated Press reports the boy is being disciplined as a result.

I wonder if he’s planning to retaliate with a walkout strike.

If this young man is bent enough to consider a different profession–may I suggest–a charter school operator? I have heard that charter applications provide hours of education and excitement.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Not so groundbreaking after all

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

My last entry celebrated the notion that Colorado may be the very first state in the nation to write legislation which would include charter school interests in district bond elections.

I take it back.

Although Colorado SB 09-176 still has a special place in my heart, it will not lead Colorado to be the first state to do so. Apparently the go-getters in New Mexico and California beat us to it.

But never fear, my innovative legislating friends!

Not to steal the thunder from the two wonderful charter supporting states that begun paving this road, but Colorado can still make history by one-upping on the minimum charter interests required.

That’s right, Colorado can show how charter school loving it is by expanding beyond other states existing charter school bond inclusions.

What does that mean? Well, here is a hint from Cacharterschools.org:

“In addition to the state lease aid program, voters have approved two state school facilities bond measures, one in 2002 (Proposition 47) and another in 2005 (Proposition 55), that contained a total of $400 million in set-asides for charter school facilities needs. The program requires a 50 percent match by the charter school and title to funded facilities vests with the local school district, not the charter school. In practice, many charter schools have found that these unfavorable provisions, combined with the myriad restrictions on using the bond funds make the program impractical.”

New Mexico is definitely a leader in the new frontier of charter school bond inclusions. This state has three recent laws concerning charter school funding: SB 455, HB 510, and SB 450. I am impressed! I will provide you with one of my favorite statements (HB 510) here for you to cut out and frame:

“F. A school district shall provide a charter

school with available facilities for the school’s operations

unless the facilities are currently used for other educational

purposes. A charter school shall not be required to pay rent

for the school district facilities if the facilities can be

provided at no cost to the school district. If facilities are

available but cannot be provided at no cost to the school

district, the school district shall not charge more than the

actual direct cost of providing the facilities.”

Change can be slow, even with new laws in effect. Lisa Grover, Executive Director of N.M. Coalition for Charter Schools expressed frustration over this in the ABQ Journal 2006:

“The New Mexico Coalition for Charter Schools, on behalf of APS charter schools, supports efforts to increase local resources and improve facilities for all students.
But we do have two important questions. Why are all 8,100 public charter school students and their families fully excluded from the “mosaic” capital plan covering facility plans from 2006 to 2013? And why were charter school student needs not discussed in any public meetings?
New Mexico school construction is overwhelmingly financed through local property taxes. This is why state law requires districts to include charter schools in facility master plans. APS nominally included charter schools in its facility plan but chose not to fund them with local property taxes until at least 2013. Why not? Charter school parents pay property taxes, too.”

Do you know what else charter school parents are?–Voters.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Proposed charter law would be a groundbreaker

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

Will Colorado be the first state to write legislation concerning equitable public school funding, specifically addressing charter school inclusions?

Colorado charter schools and districts are watching intently as a new piece of legislation is being presented to the state Senate.

SB 09-176 CONCERNING CHARTER SCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ELECTIONS is a bill, which will not only define equitable funding to charter schools in our state, but will serve as a trendsetting example to lawmakers across our nation.

Charter schools are public schools which are funded primarily by taxpayer dollars. Through current laws Colorado charter schools receive a minimum of 95% of state funded per pupil revenue (PPR) which finances public education.

To date however, revenues from local bonds (which pay for things like school buildings and transportation) have funded only district-run schools, unless a school district has included its charter schools voluntarily.

Bond generosity toward charters has varied greatly from district to district across Colorado. The Colorado League of Charter Schools (CLCS) provided a graph that illustrates such inconsistencies from the recent 2008 bond elections, in addition to reports on negative effects of funding discrepancies. A couple of honorable mentions are the Cherry Creek and Jefferson County School Districts, whose bond requests included charter school interests.

As one can imagine, the money topic can be both divisive and time-consuming for all parties involved. Months of exhausting debates took place in many counties this past election inside and outside of board meetings. Both sides have expressed they would have much rather spent that time focusing on their joint primary goal of existence-the kids’ education!

Colorado SB 09-176 would provide a statewide mandate which would clarify provisions for charter schools in a school district bond election, thereby eliminating much of the controversy. The bill addresses issues like timeliness of districts invitations to charter schools on bond elections, school board reviews of charter capitol construction needs, building ownership requirements, and other topics which have orbited the debate.

Our national leadership has spoken repeatedly of supporting states and districts that champion innovation and a positive climate for charter schools.

If Colorado Senate Bill 09-176 passes, this state may be the first in our nation to put charter school bond funding in its law.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is not just creating change, that’s making history.

Colorado SB 09-176 scheduled to be heard Wednesday February 25, 2009.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Of Rhee, reform and pinatas

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

The D.C. chancellor herself wrote an article in the Washington Post this week.

I am not surprised. Linda Darling-Hammond did the same when she felt unfairly portrayed in the press.  After much criticism and misunderstanding Rhee would like to set the record straight. A few key phrases from her write-up:

“I often speak of our district’s performance data with sadness and outrage. The situation for our city’s children is dire. Yet while I acknowledge the seriousness of the work we face, I want to be clear about something: I do not blame teachers for the low achievement levels. “

Plus:

“Rather, teachers are the solution to the vexing problems facing urban education.”

And:

“I am often asked to name the most important factor in this district’s success. It is teachers. It is their classrooms and what happens there, the expectations they set as they push students to go further. Teaching is the toughest job there is: Doing it well can keep you up at night thinking about your students, their stories and your role in their lives.”

So what I gather from the article is that in the D.C. public schools it is not the wrong teachers that are wrong with the system. It is the right teachers that are right with the system. And D.C. schools need more right than wrong.  Right?

A Monty Python scene from “A Fish Called Wanda” springs to mind. Left? Right. Right? Left…Right?

It doesn’t really seem to matter nowadays if you are a leader of low-performing schools like D.C, or in a well respected school district, such as Douglas County, Colorado. Sometimes it seems you just cannot get it right in the public’s eye.

This past weekend a Denver Post article spoke of the budget cuts facing DCSD. DCSD had given an opportunity for public comment on its web site prior to the plan and release of such expected news. The anticipated commentary arrived, but not to the directed website. It arrived in comments below the DP article. The forum broke out in a range of commentaries, some productive and insightful, while others wrote in just to sling mud at the schools or other forum members. Geez! Can’t we all just get along?

It seems to me that being a leader of public education today also means a willingness to serve as a public piñata .

Popularity: 2% [?]

Teacher pay experiment starting soon

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

Wanted!

Not dead, but very much alive:

Charter school teacher.

Salary $125,000 plus bonuses.

Someone is finally testing the much debated question “Does higher teacher earnings result in better education?”

A charter school slotted to open in 2009 in Washington Heights, NY, is taking on the challenge.

The NY Times  reports:

“I would much rather put a phenomenal, great teacher in a field with 30 kids and nothing else than take the mediocre teacher and give them half the number of students and give them all the technology in the world,” said (school founder Zeke) Vanderhoek, 31, a Yale graduate and former middle school teacher who built a test preparation company that pays its tutors far more than the competition.

Wait! That means it is really two tests in one. First, will the higher salaries yield a better education? Second, which is better; a higher paid teacher or small class sizes?

Now we’ve seen the trailer. I don’t know about you, but I can’ wait until the reviews of the main feature.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Charters may get short end of stimulus

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

How public is a public school?

Define public schools. Google it. I did.

No matter how you turn it a charter school is a public school.

So why is it that every time funding comes around, public charter school people have to fight to be included? Frankly, I am a little tired of it.

The most recent example is the $141 billion dollar pie of the economic stimulus bill.

Apparently charter schools may not receive such benefits. This is what was posted in the National Alliance for Public Charter School’s Newsletter yesterday:

Public Charter Schools Funding Jeopardized in Stimulus Bill

The economic stimulus bill being considered by the U.S. Senate this week may include as much as $16 billion for school modernization, renovation, and repair and another $125 billion in education spending. But public charter schools’ ability to access these funds in the same fair and equitable way as all other public schools is in jeopardy. Public charter schools deserve equal access to federal appropriations – that’s a principle long established in law. Charter school supporters can help right Contact your Member of Congress right now.

What? Is this not a large enough sum to include ALL public schools? Are charter schools exempt from hardship in our economy? Okay, you can stop snickering. If the charter schools get the short end of the financial stick during these times we may lose some fantastic schools. Perhaps wealthy families can move on to private schools, but the ones hit the hardest will be the low income and middle class, who cannot afford privatized options.

If you are a Colorado legislator, you know this stimulus bill will affect nearly sixty thousand charter school children in our state. Would leaving their schools out be a cost of economic downtimes we can afford? Should we really risk that that these children of our state and hundreds of thousands of charter school students nationally, get to pay with their education?

So, I ask you: How public does a public school need to be, to be a public charter school?

It seems a fair question.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Parent-teacher conferences an endangered species?

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

The Gazette.Net  is reporting that a Maryland school district may drop parent/teacher conferences to avoid “short school days, extra child care and interrupted schedules.” The article reads:

“Eliminating conferences may resolve that problem and reduce the amount of instructional time that students lose. And the impact of the change may not be significant because parents can check grades online and use e-mail to communicate with teachers every day, said board member Michael Schaden.”

I am scratching my head confused over the mixed signals. I thought teachers liked seeing the parents face to face? I, the parent, surely appreciate the 15-20 minutes a semester that I get to look the teacher in the eye and learn how I best can help my child be successful.

One of my teacher friends recently told me that there is a significant difference in parent/teacher conference attendance when comparing traditional schools and charters. She shared that the last school she taught at had max 70% parent participation, while 100% of the parents at the charter school she now teaches at always attend. Why?

The parents at our charter school organize and prepare dinners for the teachers during conferences, since they stay late for our sake. Is this behavior abnormal?

I know English is my second language and I blog in ESL, but the concept of this article is so foreign to me it may just as well have been written in Japanese…

Popularity: 2% [?]

Colorado Health Foundation Walton Family Foundation Daniels fund Pitton Foundations Donnell-Kay Foundation