The PEBC Network
Click to PEBC.org
Click to EdNewsColorado.org
Click to Boettcherteachers.org
Click to Education Research and Practice

Systemic change vs. atomization

Posted by Mark Sass Mar 10th, 2010.

I have not thrown in the towel on systemic change for our schools. I continue to worry that the atomization of schools—charters, magnet schools—brings about pockets of excellence in urban school districts opposed to improvement in larger numbers.

Michael Fullan has written extensively on his education reform work with the Province of Ontario in Canada and other large districts in the United States and England. He has a new book “Motion Leadership: the Skinny on Becoming Change Savvy.” It is a quick read (78 pages) and it is a nice companion to some of his other books.

Popularity: 14% [?]

One Response to “Systemic change vs. atomization”

  1. Kevin Crosby says:

    I’m not sure systemic change and atomization are mutually exclusive. My hope is, since atomization is happening anyway, that it will inspire and motivate more comprehensive systemic change and thus “improvement in larger numbers.”

Leave a Reply

Daniels fundColorado League of Charter SchoolsColorado Childrens CampaignCollege InvestPitton FoundationsDonnell-Kay Foundation