This is one of those teacher diary type blog posts. At this moment, policy seems to me about the least useful tool in education reform. (I’m having one of those days).
It’s finals week and since most of my class finished their test on Monday (it didn’t take them as long as I had imagined and I’m happy to report that most of them did pretty well), I spent our scheduled time today talking with the few kids who turned up. The main theme of the conversation was the culture of physical violence in which they have grown up.
I find it most striking that they appear to revel in it. People getting hurt badly is “hilarious.” I don’t know enough about their internal experience to tell but I suspect such a response is a form of psychological armor. Of course, I’m a math teacher and not a psychologist so I’ll leave it to better trained professionals to make that determination.
I hasten to add that I don’t think these are bad kids at all. In fact, I quite like them and that they’re sitting in my room in a school after the experiences they describe (and being assured that, “oh, Mister, that’s nothing …”) says something about their strength. These kids did not drop out, made it to their junior or senior year, and most of them will probably graduate. They clearly get that they need a diploma but they don’t show a lot of interest (outwardly anyway) in the expectations of school. Their grades certainly don’t reflect their obvious intelligence and resourcefulness.
Immediately following this conversation another student of mine, one who most probably did not grow up in a violent household, walked up to me in the hall and handed me a holiday gift with a smile. He’s a 9th grader in an honors class and doing well.
The contrast between this “thank you, you’re very kind” experience and the “oh my god” experience of minutes before hit me hard. Without the second experience, the first would have been just another reminder of the challenges many of my kids face. Instead, it has created a dissonance in my head that I’m not sure what to do with. And so here I am at the keyboard.
Now, I know perfectly well that not all lower income people grow up or live with violence. And I am also aware that physical, verbal and emotional abuse takes place in wealthy households too. However, I have worked with economically disadvantaged kids my entire career and I know the experience is common enough that I think any conversation about reform must explicitly include the supports to develop non-violent and productive ways to solve problems and to help students transfer what they learn to settings outside of school.
And honestly, most of the kids who did not grow up with violence could use some support in learning these skills too.
Popularity: 4% [?]





The Peaceful Person curriculum developed at the Namaste Charter School in Chicago seems promising. Does anyone reading have any direct knowledge of it?
Hi!
I’m Namaste Charter School’s Director of Development – email me and I’d be happy to share more.
Thanks for your interest in our work – happy holidays, all!
Allison
Thank you for this, Jeff. I love teacher diary blog posts. We need more so that we can remember how policy and the classroom intersect.
Your diary entry made me think about how I am overwhelmed with the challenges I face as a new teacher because of the greater challenges my low-income, English-learning students face outside the classroom.
One of your last comments, about students transferring the skills from school to their lives outside of school, made me think about the reverse as well. With CSAP bidding us a fond farewell, what will the next standardized assessment look like? Will it do a better job of honoring the many skills and talents my students bring into the classroom? So much of what the test assesses is socioeconomic context. I would at least appreciate more multicultural texts so that my students’ experiences are represented in the assessment as often as their more affluent peers’ experiences are represented. But then, changing the assessment doesn’t change the world we’re trying to prepare them for. Or does it?
By the way, I don’t know anything about the Namaste curriculum you mentioned, but here are a few other resources I’ve come across.
http://www.edliberation.org/
They offer online networking, some of which is aimed at non-violence and peace studies specifically.
http://www.tolerance.org/
They just organized the Mix It Up Day that breaks down social cliques within schools.
A Curriculum of Peace: Selected Essays from English Journal
Though aimed specifically at English teachers, this might offer you something as well.
Your thoughts?